Friday, April 19, 2013
Friday, February 8, 2013
Are you kiddn' me!?
<Disclaimer> I'm not a political person. I mean it's only been a few months that I really started to take notice of what's going on around me. So obviously I might have my facts wrong.. I do however try my absolute best to research on my own, from what I believe to be truthful sources.. then form my own opinion on the matter. But don't take my word for it.. Do your part, research and educate yourself.. learn the facts and form your own opinions too!.</Disclaimer>
So let me get this straight.. we have a President that's trying to take away OUR guns, which violates the 2nd Amendment, then SELLING those guns freely to Mexican drug cartels, causing even more crazy shootings a crossed the border... trying to KEEP the power to kill U.S Citizens without trial (how the HECK was that allowed in the first place?!) violating the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th Amendments (see below for excerpts).Is this really what we signed up for?
Same goes for current Politicians taking a similar Oath. source: senate.gov
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States ... "
What's going on here?! Why are there so many Officials completely ignoring their Oaths and the United States SUPREME LAW!?
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. "
Oath of office of the President of the United States. sourse: wikipedia.org
...., and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
I don't understand... he said those words.. he in FACT repeated them TWICE (audio proof at the above source), yet he defiantly disregards them?
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States ... "
What's going on here?! Why are there so many Officials completely ignoring their Oaths and the United States SUPREME LAW!?
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. "
So I ask YOU, why do we allow political figures (Including the PRESIDENT) to freely, openly and defiantly ATTACK our Constitution?
source: archives.gov
2nd (..., the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.)
4th (The right of the people to be secure in their persons, ..., against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, ...)
5th (No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, ... without due process of law; ...)
6th (... right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, ...)
7th (..., the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, ...)
8th (,.. nor cruel and unusual punishments inflected.)
2nd (..., the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.)
4th (The right of the people to be secure in their persons, ..., against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, ...)
5th (No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, ... without due process of law; ...)
6th (... right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, ...)
7th (..., the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, ...)
8th (,.. nor cruel and unusual punishments inflected.)
Sunday, February 3, 2013
The year is 2133. We the People.....
"Government was created to protect your rights and should have no goal higher than the protection of those rights. When government's own goals override your rights, government is acting unconstitutionally."
The year is 2133. We the people, currently live in Government approved homes. They are built level with the ground so that steps are unnecessary Steps were outlawed in 2096 due to too many trip and fall deaths. They are typically dome style featureless homes painted plain white or gray. The interior of these homes have rounded corners and are 98% covered in padded walls and floors
Government often states that these violations of citizens' rights are necessary "for the good of society."
The year is 2133. We the people, currently live in Government approved homes. They are built level with the ground so that steps are unnecessary Steps were outlawed in 2096 due to too many trip and fall deaths. They are typically dome style featureless homes painted plain white or gray. The interior of these homes have rounded corners and are 98% covered in padded walls and floors
One 32 inch television set is provided free of charge per family and is professionally installed in a central location of the home by an officer of the Government. It is embedded flush into a wall as to not create any protruding corners. Government Officials voted remote controls unsafe for general public health. They contribute to obesity and laziness. Officials also viewed them as potential weapons. All TV's are touch screen, for our protection and safety.
Furniture items, like tables are Government approved because they are one piece molded foam.
In 2093 alone there were 9 fall related deaths from the use of chairs. Chairs were outlawed in 2094. We sit on the soft padded floor, for our protection and safety.
Grocery stores were banned in 2036. A record high of 6 injury's and 1 death were reported between 2030 and 2035 due to improperly mopping floors.
Food is Government issued weekly in approved unsealed foam boxes, one box per person. Inside each box are 21 microwave "tv dinners". Refrigeration and utensils are unnecessary. Each food item is self contained, you simply open and drink. All kitchen related appliances (except one) and utensils were banned in 2047 after the Kitchen Violence Act took effect. Microwaves are the only Government approved cooking device. They are only large enough to perfectly fit 1 tv dinner at a time, provided free and inspected weekly.
Stoves, ovens and anything that requires an open flame were also included in the Kitchen Violence Act. The use of an open flame is only suitable for official Government use, for our protection and safety.
In 2100, all flavored beverages were banned from human consumption. Water is the only approved liquid. Water is provided by the Government and stored in Gov. approved drinking devices. Plastic 12 fluid ounce hermetically sealed sippy cups.. to prevent drowning.
Because after all.. it's for the good of society... right?
Monday, January 28, 2013
The assault weapons ban is a joke!
Banning rifles because it "LOOKS menacing", “LOOKS like a military weapon” or because it uses a pistol GRIP? Yes that's a joke..
"Assault Weapons" that civilians can legally buy provide the same functionality as most Hunting rifles.
Both are semi-automatic. Semi-auto means ONE bullet is fired for each time the trigger is pulled. To fire again you must release the trigger and pull again. Almost all Hand Guns are in fact semi-automatic!
a quick look at murders from 2006 to 2010 (pulled from fbi.gov):
4147 deaths from personal weapons (hands, fists, feet, etc)
3031 from blunt objects (clubs, hammers, etc)
1980 deaths from rifles.
Now, I'm not trying to belittle those deaths.. they are all tragic and I wish never happened. But to ban guns, just simply wont stop deaths/murders.
It's my belief that if somehow we were to remove every single gun (mind you ANY firearm).. those gun related deaths WOULD STILL HAPPEN. Just by other means... hands, feet, knives, bats.. frying pans..
If a criminal wants to do harm.. he/she does not need a rifle or gun to do so.
Joe Biden admits Assuault Weapons account for a very small fraction of incidents in the latest "Fireside hangout" he hosted.
Bottom line, I think banning gun based on looks or features is just a waste of time.
I like the idea of gun education. Education, education, education! Even for those that might be afraid of guns. You could still take a class that teaches basic safety rules/guidelines with out even touching a real gun. If it piques your interest, then continue on to a more advanced classes. Or not, but then you'd still have basic safety knowledge at hand.
Guns in schools, there has been an idea bouncing around of employing dedicated officers to patrol schools. I think that's a great idea to be honest. and I mean why not? Maybe go as far as employing trained security guards. As long as there are adequate measures taken to ensure they are trained and mentally fit to be armed guards.
Educate yourself
"Assault Weapons" that civilians can legally buy provide the same functionality as most Hunting rifles.
Both are semi-automatic. Semi-auto means ONE bullet is fired for each time the trigger is pulled. To fire again you must release the trigger and pull again. Almost all Hand Guns are in fact semi-automatic!
a quick look at murders from 2006 to 2010 (pulled from fbi.gov):
4147 deaths from personal weapons (hands, fists, feet, etc)
3031 from blunt objects (clubs, hammers, etc)
1980 deaths from rifles.
Now, I'm not trying to belittle those deaths.. they are all tragic and I wish never happened. But to ban guns, just simply wont stop deaths/murders.
It's my belief that if somehow we were to remove every single gun (mind you ANY firearm).. those gun related deaths WOULD STILL HAPPEN. Just by other means... hands, feet, knives, bats.. frying pans..
If a criminal wants to do harm.. he/she does not need a rifle or gun to do so.
Joe Biden admits Assuault Weapons account for a very small fraction of incidents in the latest "Fireside hangout" he hosted.
Bottom line, I think banning gun based on looks or features is just a waste of time.
I like the idea of gun education. Education, education, education! Even for those that might be afraid of guns. You could still take a class that teaches basic safety rules/guidelines with out even touching a real gun. If it piques your interest, then continue on to a more advanced classes. Or not, but then you'd still have basic safety knowledge at hand.
Guns in schools, there has been an idea bouncing around of employing dedicated officers to patrol schools. I think that's a great idea to be honest. and I mean why not? Maybe go as far as employing trained security guards. As long as there are adequate measures taken to ensure they are trained and mentally fit to be armed guards.
Educate yourself
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)